Winning or FUNdamentals, which comes first?
We, as coaches, have the desire to win. A winning program always seems to be the one that everyone wants to talk about and emulate.
What coach wouldn't want to have an established basketball program like the University of North Carolina or newer developing program like the University of Florida?
However, what has made that winning program, is it superior athletes or superior coaching or a combination of both? It is
probably a little bit of everything. If we are going to coach youth-aged athletes, then we as the coaches should know how important it
is to teach fundamentals as well as winning and losing. These school-aged players want to win bad enough without our help. We could become
"cheerleaders" for our teams, or isn't that part of being a coach.
The problem with basketball is that it is a game, that usually means there is a winner and a loser. You can teach all
the fundamentals in the world and have an undersized team, and who is going to win the game? I think we should care.
Everyone wants their child to play club ball. It's supposed to make you better, right? Whether it is AAU, YBOA, or the local
YMCA, coaches are more than ever emphasizing the "W". They will continue to play their strongest, most skilled players while
the other players watch from the sidelines. There is nothing more demoralizing than losing to a kid that doesn't get the
opportunity to play. Come on Coach, give every player a chance. What was the score anyway? Lighten up guys, this is not the NBA and
try to convince me differently.
We have tried maybe a bit too hard to take the competitiveness out of youth sports today. We need to find a middle ground. Remember Little League baseball's pledge to start every game,
"but win or lose, I will always do my best.". Would you want a team that didn't care or had no desire? Or would you want a team
that tried their best every time? I have looked at both sides of this coin.
I had the opportunity to coach a team that actually had no "heart". They had no desire to win` or lose for that matter. You could not inspire these kids to even try. Their skills showed.
We lost 19 of 20 games that season. It didn't bother these kids at all. Out of fourteen kids on this Little League team only one had
competitiveness. He had skills and fundsamentals. The rest couldn't even catch a ball. They literally had no desire to try. Win or lose
I will always do my best, NOT.
On the other side of the same coin, I have had many teams that tried their hardest and lost. But, at the end, no one had their heads down. They knew they tried
their hardest and that was the importance of trying to them. They would come to practice desiring to become better players. It had nothing
to do with winning, it was practice. Game time would come and maybe we would win. But I always knew these kids would try their
hardest. That is called "competitiveness" coaches. Not winning.
These are just my feelings as a coach with the same problem as everyone else, fundamentals are essential, offense and
defense are important. But shouldn't winning mean something? What has happened to being competitive? Is it the coach or the
player? Maybe you should make the call yourself.
A Youth Coach
NOTICE:All material on this web site is copyrighted. No article may be reproduced or redistributed in any form or manner
without the expressed written consent of the respective author
Our thanks to
Human Kinetics for sending us some excellent coaching books.
You can't beat the discounted price, less than $20 including shipping.
Buy it, today!
Excellent video with thoughts and drills on organizing your practices. Learn from one of the greatest coaches of the game, Coach "K".
Click here to order
"My son's high school coach gave him a copy of the book and he read it in two days. Now he is leading the effort to get himself a
scholarship. The book is inspiring and effective for high school athletes." a reader from New York city
Click here to order